Join our Mailing List

"For a happier, more stable and civilized future, each of us must develop a sincere, warm-hearted feeling of brotherhood and sisterhood."

India and China or India vs. China?

December 8, 2009

New America Media

India Currents, Commentary, Sanjoy Banerjee, Posted: Dec 07, 2009

The relationship between India and China has basically been unfriendly
since the late 1950s. Even when the direct relationship between the two
has been quiet, China has helped Pakistan acquire mass-destruction and
conventional weapons for no purpose other than to undermine India. In
the last few months, the direct relationship became tenser.

China has claimed the territory of Arunachal Pradesh since the 1950s.
However, that claim was made with restraint until a few years ago. China
has offered in the past to give up its claim to Arunachal Pradesh if
India gave up its claims to Aksai Chin in the Kashmir area. In the last
two years, China has begun to assert its claim to Arunachal Pradesh more
stridently. China considers that territory to be part of Tibet, and thus
part of China. The people of Arunachal have much cultural commonality
with Tibetans, as do other Himalayan ethnicities. There is an ancient
Buddhist monastery there of considerable religious significance to
Tibetans. India holds that Arunachal has a mixed culture and has always
been a distinct territory from Tibet.

As China has made more statements asserting its claim on Arunachal
Pradesh and built up military infrastructure across the border from the
state, India has become increasingly alarmed. This summer India moved an
additional 60,000 soldiers into the state. So far, China has not
responded with similar troop movements. However, it does appear that
China has been attempting to restrict Indian actions in the state
through verbal intimidation. In October 2009, Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh went to Arunachal Pradesh and gave a speech supporting his party
during the state elections there. The Chinese government described the
Prime Minister?s action as ?provocative? and warned India to be careful
not to trigger a border incident; a bizarre statement given that an
election speech by the Prime Minister has no direct bearing on military
relations between India and China.

The Dalai Lama has long wished to visit the monastery in Arunachal
Pradesh. The Indian government has prevented him from doing so to avoid
angering China. However, as China began to assert its claim more to the
territory more vigorously, the Indian government decided it needed to
make the point that India was the sovereign power in Arunachal. Delhi
decided to allow the Dalai Lama to visit the historic Buddhist monastery
in Arunachal?s capital Tawang. This was a symbolic action specifically
directed against China.

In October and November there were meetings between Manmohan Singh and
Chinese premier Wen Jiabao and between the foreign ministers of the two
countries. In mid-November, the Dalai Lama did visit the monastery in
Tawang. The Chinese statements about the visit have been less
threatening than those about the Prime Minister?s election speech a
month earlier. The foreign ministers announced that disagreements
between the two countries should not impede progress of other issues.
This marks a return to the earlier understanding between the two
countries. There appears to have been a shift toward greater restraint
in Chinese policy regarding the territorial dispute after the high-level
meetings. This occurred despite, or perhaps because of, India?s
determination to let the Dalai Lama visit Tawang. Once it became
apparent that a diplomatically threatening posture toward India would
not produce the desired results, the posture shifted.

In the last thirty years, China has raced ahead economically. Its 2008
GDP, measured using American prices (Purchasing Power Parity), amounted
to 56% of America?s. Such progress has produced a new self-confidence in
China. While India has progressed less than China, it has not stood
still. Its 2008 purchasing power GDP stood at 24% of America?s, and 42%
of China?s. This alone makes India a great power. The diplomatic tussle
over the disputed border may have driven the point home in the right
quarters in China.

Until the 1980s, China pursued a high-risk foreign policy. China engaged
and pushed back the U.S. army in Korea in 1950. It was China that took
the more aggressive stance toward the superpower U.S.S.R in the 1960s.
China initiated a war against India in 1962 after losing 20 million
people in a famine two years earlier, and saw fit to help Pakistan get
nuclear weapons in the early 1980s while at the same economic level as
India. However, towards the 1980s, China?s foreign policy became
low-risk. Its recent aggressiveness toward India reflects an assessment
that India was so weak that the risk was low. Ultranationalist
newspapers in China taunted India for its weakness over the last summer.
It is possible that a more mature assessment of India has now emerged in

Both Chinese and Indian leaders have now proclaimed that the world is
big enough for both countries. This is true, as the world is now
genuinely multi-polar. In 2008 there were ten countries, including
Mexico, with purchasing power GDP a tenth or more of the United States.
The notion of India and China locked together in a power struggle makes
no sense. Both must take into account several other emerging powers.Both
India and China are attending closely to the United States. Obama?s
recent visit to China demonstrated China?s new strength as it did not
bend to American demands. Nonetheless, China?s current economic strategy
requires America to embark on yet another round of massive borrowing to
support China?s exports. America does not wish to do that, and cannot. A
trade confrontation is brewing. Manmohan Singh will visit America in
late November. The issues will be more security-related than economic.
India will have to maneuver in the ranks of lesser global powers and
keep the way clear for ascent in the future.

Sanjoy Banerjee teaches International Relations at San Francisco State
CTC National Office 1425 René-Lévesque Blvd West, 3rd Floor, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1T7
T: (514) 487-0665
Developed by plank